Village Legal Enforcement Actions

A stop work order issued during a flooding emergency, $500/day fine threats, three weeks of unanswered legal correspondence, a ZBA proceeding filed under protest with a $3,500 fee — and an estimated $250,000 in Village taxpayer money spent defending a pattern of selective enforcement.

~$250,000 estimated Village legal expenditureSources: court filings, timestamped email records, filed applications

The Flooding Emergency

Pond levels on Ragnar's property had risen to the point of flooding the shared access road serving two homes. Nassau County Police documented the hazard. Before beginning any work, Ragnar sent Inspector Richardson a two-minute video explaining the situation — proactive communication that emergency drainage maintenance does not require a permit.

Flooded driveway and road access

Flooded road access

Elevated pond levels

Elevated pond levels

Flooded access path, Dec 2023

Flooded path, Dec 2023

Photography submitted as Exhibit 12 — Pond Flooding Documentation

Stop Work Order Issued

Rather than acknowledging the emergency nature of the drainage work, Inspector Richardson issued a Stop Work Order the following day — actively preventing Ragnar from completing the maintenance required to restore road access. The roads remained blocked for residents and essential vehicles including the garbage truck.

Exhibit 10A — Stop Work Order

$500/Day Fine Threat — On the Wrong Parcel

The same day as the Stop Work Order, Ragnar received a formal violation letter from Village counsel Humes & Wagner threatening $500 per day in civil penalties. The SWO cited parcel SBL 28,66,200 — a parcel that does not have fill or boulders on it. The Village simultaneously demanded removal of material and prohibited any work to remove it.

Humes & Wagner, P.C. — Violation Letter, December 22, 2023View Exhibit 10B

RE: Village of Centre Island Code Enforcement — Parcel SBL 28,66,200

You are hereby notified that the above-referenced property is in violation of the Village Code. You are directed to immediately cease and desist all work and to remove all illegally placed fill and boulders from the property.

Pursuant to Village Law, you may be subject to a civil penalty of $500 per day commencing December 19, 2023 for each day the violation continues.

— Humes & Wagner, P.C., Village Attorneys

Note: The Stop Work Order cites SBL 28,66,200 — a parcel that does not contain the fill and boulders referenced in the violation letter.

Holiday Email Chain — Flooding Continues

On Christmas Eve and Christmas Day, Ragnar sent three emails escalating through the full chain of Village leadership. Tenants could not access their homes. Roads remained flooded. No corrective response was received.

December 24, 2023 · 3:00 PMEmail 1 of 3

To: Village Attorney Peter MacKinnon; Building Inspector Joseph Richardson

I am writing to formally object to the stop work order and violation notice issued on December 22, 2023. The work performed was emergency maintenance of critical drainage infrastructure to prevent flooding of access roads serving two occupied residences.

This represents arbitrary and capricious enforcement. If this matter is not resolved immediately, I will be forced to pursue damages in excess of $50,000 for interference with my property rights and the safety of my tenants.

"Taxpaying residents won't be too pleased to learn their village is spending their money this way."

December 24, 2023 · 3:07 PMEmail 2 of 3

To: Mayor Schmidlapp; Deputy Mayor Chalos

I am forwarding this directly to you as the elected officials responsible for Village administration. A stop work order was issued yesterday preventing me from completing emergency drainage work — the sole purpose of which was to restore safe road access for tenants currently unable to reach their homes.

The roads remain flooded. This is a safety matter and I am requesting your immediate intervention to rescind the stop work order and withdrawal of threatened fines.

December 26, 2023Email 3 of 3

To: Mayor Schmidlapp; Deputy Mayor Chalos; Village Attorney MacKinnon; Inspector Richardson

This is my third written communication over Christmas regarding the flooding emergency on my property. I have received no substantive response from any Village official.

If this matter is not resolved before the January 9th hearing, my general counsel will pursue damages against the Village.

I am documenting this correspondence as evidence of the Village's failure to respond to a safety emergency it created through improper enforcement.

Equal Enforcement Inquiry — No Response

Following the stop work order, Ragnar formally inquired about enforcement against a neighboring property (Doering) with documented fill, fencing, commercial boat storage, and unpermitted outbuildings — activities equal to or greater in scope than those for which Ragnar received a $500/day fine threat. No documented enforcement action resulted.

Ragnar's property — enforced

Emergency drainage during flooding — December 2023

Emergency drainage during active road flooding → Stop Work Order + $500/day fine threat

Neighboring property — ignored

Unpermitted shipping container and abandoned vessel on neighboring property

Unpermitted shipping containers, commercial boat work, fill violations → no documented enforcement action

Unpermitted outbuilding

Unpermitted outbuilding

Additional outbuilding

Additional outbuilding

Shipping container

Shipping container

Commercial boat work

Commercial boat work

ZBA Proceeding — Filed Under Protest

After nearly two years with no written decision on the Parcel 9 building permit, Ragnar filed a ZBA appeal on December 4, 2025 — under protest and subject to litigation — challenging the Village's refusal to issue a decision. The $3,500 filing fee was paid under protest as a condition of being heard.

The Village has taxed and recognized Parcel 9 as a separate buildable lot for over 80 years. The Village's own legal counsel produced a 1987 vested rights report acknowledging Parcel 9 as buildable. The ZBA proceeding is ongoing. Multiple adjournments have been granted since the December 2025 filing. The parallel Supreme Court litigation is indexed under Index No. 617568/2025.

Dec 4, 2025

ZBA filing date

$3,500

Filing fee — paid under protest

80+ years

Village recognition of Parcel 9 as taxable separate lot

0

Written permit decisions issued in ~3 years

Exhibit 6 — Parcel 9 Permit Application

~$250,000 in Estimated Village Legal Expenditure

Village taxpayers have funded the legal defense of this enforcement pattern. Based on standard municipal legal rates and the documented scope of proceedings, the estimate below reflects the public cost of the Village's posture.

Cost Breakdown — Estimated

ItemEst. Amount
Village Attorney (MacKinnon) — litigation response fees, 2023–present$95,000–$120,000
ZBA special counsel and hearing preparation, Dec 2025–present$40,000–$60,000
Supreme Court litigation defense (Index No. 617568/2025)$35,000–$55,000
Building inspector documentation, stop work order enforcement, appeals preparation$15,000–$25,000
Administrative and municipal overhead$10,000–$20,000
Estimated Total~$250,000

Estimates based on standard Nassau County municipal legal rates. Actual invoices are subject to FOIL request.

What this enforcement record has cost.

$3,500

ZBA filing fee paid under protest — required just to be heard

~$250K

Estimated Village taxpayer money spent on legal defense of this posture

0

Written permit decisions issued — approval or denial — in nearly three years

This page is drawn from Exhibit 10A (Stop Work Order), Exhibit 10B (Humes & Wagner violation letter), Exhibit 11 (email chain, Dec 24–26, 2023), Exhibit 9 (unregulated neighboring activities), and the Parcel 9 ZBA application filed December 4, 2025 in connection with Oelsner v. Village of Centre Island, Index No. 617568/2025. Cost estimates are based on standard municipal legal billing rates; actual expenditures are subject to FOIL request.